Hello dear ‘learner’,
I am so pleased to let you know that I have found out even
more about the communities of practice. I hope you are on the same page as
me as I would like to share with you my ideas and maybe, who knows, debate them.
So, from the last time we have spoken, I have learnt that
these communities, as you can probably imagine, are voluntary. Despite this
fact, what makes them successful over time is their ability to generate enough
excitement, relevance and value to attract and engage members. This is the phenomenon
that the authors called ‘aliveness’. Don’t you agree with them? I know I do. I
mean, if you’re not actively participating to these meetings, if you’re not
brainstorming on a given subject or idea, if you do not actively communicate with
each other, it wouldn’t be called a community. You need energy,- positive energy - to sustain an entire community and you need to invite the interaction that makes
your community to be alive.
Now, a more theoretical knowledge of a community relies in
its design. So, the design principles that are stated by the authors of the ‘Communities
of practice’ book are the following:
1. Design for evolution.
2. Open a dialogue between inside and
outside perspectives.
3. Invite different levels of
participation.
4. Develop both public and private
community spaces.
5. Focus on value.
6. Combine familiarity and excitement.
7. Create a rhythm for the community.
If you were to think about this matter, they
are totally true. You know how it looks like in practice, but, once written
down, it all makes sense now. Making the design principles explicit makes it
possible to be more flexible and improvisational. The key to designing for
evolution is to combine design elements in a way that catalyzes community
development, such as: the physical structures (e.g places), but as the social
and organizational structures (e.g community coordinator). Now, a community
needs an insider’s perspective to lead the discovery of what the community is
about, but it also needs an outside perspective related to the potential
development of the community. This I could not agree more, because, you see, we
–as part of a community- tend to find it hard to imagine how much more could
our community evolve, how many goals are there to be set, how to understand
better the issues inside the community and so on. Also, during their evolution,
communities were creating standards of good practice, organizing and
systematizing their activities.
Oh well, the communities were not
always like this, of course. They have evolved in time, they have suffered radical
transformations, they have grown, they have fallen, but in the
end, they kept on continually evolving. The studies show how there are five
stages of community development: potential, coalescing, maturing, stewardship
and transformation. To be more specific, we can observe the following image:
Given the above, we may
be tempted to think that maturity is a time of stability, but communities, like
people, change and grow during their maturity as much as they do during their
formation. The ongoing life of an active community is rich and complex. It
contains many relationships, many levels of connection, and many subgroups
within it. Mature communities go through cycles of high and low energy as they
respond, adjust and reorganize. Isn’t that right? How I see things, the composing
elements could not exist but together and linked. The life of a community may have its ups and
downs, but this is part of its existence and it defines the community itself. Going
through their life, communities need support to continue. This support must
come from the energy, from the passion and from the strength of its members. As
long as the community’s members efforts are sustainable and continuous, the
community will go further on.
As a side note, what I gave found
interesting again are the ‘distributed communities’, which by the book means
any community of practice that cannot rely on face-to-face meetings and interactions
as its primary vehicle for connecting members ( as C. Dede stated in its paper,
these communities refer to virtual or distance education initiatives). Thinking
about it, nowadays we have more distributed communities rather than the normal
ones and this is primarily because of the evolution of the technology from the
last century. They are no different than local communities, but the fact that
they share ideas and insights, help each other, document procedures and influence
operating teams and business units across communication networks.
The transformation potentially brought
about by communities of practice is twofold. First, communities become more
than an integral way of running the business; they become the focal structure,
a point of stability in an organization constantly reshaping itself to match
the demands of a market in flux. Second, communities do not merely transform
how the business operates; they transform it continuously. This way, it has been proven that transformation
has become a way of life.
Today’s post was a little bit more
theoretical, but I hope it was enjoyable as well. So, until the next time, keep
up the good work within your communities, because together we are so much more powerful . :)